What Happened During The 1790 S - 1366 Words

As early as the 1700 s slaves were common in the United States; they usually worked as farm hands in order to grow tobacco and indigo. But they were not present in huge numbers before the 1790 s, and there was even a trend towards states banning or limiting the slave trade before that time. ‘What happened during the 1790 s?’ you ask. Well, as the United States grew westwards the cultivation of cotton, a valuable but labor intensive plant, grew as well. There was an enormous demand for cotton by textile manufacturers in Europe, due to a recent invention that allowed mass production. Cotton was previously a very difficult crop to profit from, because of the long hours required to separate cotton seeds from the actual cotton fibers. This†¦show more content†¦2. Pinedo 2 Slaves being transported to the South were usually ripped from their families and the surroundings they were familiar and comfortable with. These slaves then faced their new life at the plantation, a very different environment from what they were used to. They faced harder work, such as clearing trees and planting crops, than they had back in the ‘old Southern states’. The great demand for slaves on the plantations produced two very distinct types of slaves, rural and urban. Rural slaves, as you might have guessed worked on the plantations usually from dawn till dusk, driven by their overseer. Whereas urban slavery resulted from the lack of white laborers in the mining and lumber industries, because so many whites defected to the cotton industry in hopes of making a larger profit. As a result there was an increased demand for slaves in mills and in ships, so slaves that had learned specialized skills in the plantations, were in high demand in Southern cities. Slave owners hired out their slaves to work wherever their skills were required. This means that the owners left their slaves unsupervised all day, unlike the plantations where they were always under his watc hful eye. Many of the slaves who worked in the cities cited them as incredibly different from working on the plantation. In the city a slave was almost a free man compared to the plantations, he got better food, clothes and privileges. Also the acts of cruelty

To what extent did Russia undergo economic Free Essays

To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-14? After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system. In early 1906 the October Manifesto was published as a result of the 1905 revolution and as a way to appease the peasants and appear as a revolutionary change, when truly very little was changed by this. We will write a custom essay sample on To what extent did Russia undergo economic or any similar topic only for you Order Now Political activity was now legal so political parties now no longer needed to remain secrets; freedom of speech was also introduced along with the introduction of a state elected Duma. Most of these changes were made as a bid to make the peasants content and prevent the chances of another revolution; however this also banned trade unions and newspapers. The introduction of the first Duma was short lived due to to the disapproval of the Tsar, who dissolved it under the Fundamental Law, after only 73 days. This was due to the number of members that were revolutionaries, who wanted to push through more moral ideas and reforms than the Tsar was willing to do, only 2 out of 391 made it into the law. This then led to the Wborg manifesto, which was a group of frustrated Duma members teaming up to go against the Tsar’s action of raising taxes – unfortunately this backfired, leading to all 200 members being banned from standing in the next Duma. The next Duma followed a similar suit, Just with the gaining of the Social Revolutionaries and the Social Democrats gaining seats, it was the third and fourth Dumas that raised the most change within Russian society, but this may have been due to the Electoral Reform. In order to make sure that the government gained the best support, voting was restrained to the wealthy, meaning that only 30% of Russia could vote. This meant that the majority of the revolutionaries supporters could not vote, leading to to mostly pro-government parties winning the vote. The Duma was never seen as political institution and was never meant to be, it was supposed to be a simple forum o please the masses and make them believe that the autocracy was listening. The Third ; Fourth Dumas managed to make some successful reforms as the government were more inclined to listen to them, they managed to replace the biased Land Captains, introduced universal primary education, create health and accident insurance programmes and made improvements to the army and navy. Despite the fact that the Duma were never supposed to be parliamentary, they still successfully managed to have the Duma debates reported in the press, meaning that the reformers and radicals participating managed to influence public opinion egitimately – something that had been denied to them previously. This reform had helped helped create political reform, as it had created a space where a forum for political debate could be taken note ot, and could be published without being censored. It meant that political parties had been established legally, and despite the fact that the Third and Fourth Dumas thwarted many reforms, they helped too, as not all of the seats in this institution had been pro-government. Another factor affecting the amount of political change over the years is the use of Peter Stolypin, the Russian Prime Minister from 1906- 1911. It is hard not to see Stolypin as a reformer, as he evidently saw what policies and laws needed to be changed or created in order to vanquish any repeat of the revolution, as he brought great changed to the Russian countryside, giving peasants the freedom to leave their communes, offering them cheap land in Siberia, or helping them to own their pieces of land through the redistribution of peasant wealth through the Land Bank. This had a big impact, as it lead to 50% of peasants having ownership of land, and agricultural production had risen from 45. 9 million tonnes to 61. 7 million tonnes in 1913. It is said by historians hat had war not broken out, Russia could have developed a more stable, loyal and prosperous peasantry, as Stolypin envisaged. On the other hand, despite the rise on crop yields and production, not much was done about the living and working conditions of Russia’s industrial workers. This was definitely shown after his assassination, where a plague of Russian unrest came around again, only leading to the Lena Goldfield massacre of 1912 in Siberia, which led to strikers being killed by the police. This was then a tipping point for more strikes and demonstrations, reminiscent of the 1905 revolution, to take place, showing that despite the fact Stolypin had helped reform a little economically, it was immediately undone by the wrath of popular unrest amongst the lower classes once more. From these two arguments it is very easy to see points helping question the extent of the Russian economic and political changes over the years, but I believe that the true tipping point comes to the Fundamental Law. This Fundamental Law, created in 1906, created the constitution of the Russian Empire, creating a national parliament with the lower house (the Duma), being elected. This all sounds very good, and sounds like political eforms were in their heights in 1906 – but this was completely changed in Article 87. This gave the right for the Tsar to govern by decree, thereby ignoring his faithfully created’ parliament. This basically meant that the creation of the Duma was practically pointless, as the Tsar could still change his mind as to what laws he wanted created, and which laws he would go against, putting incredible restrictions on how much could be done within the Russian Empire. Therefore, I find that the extent to which the Russian Empire underwent economic and political changes were the smallest possible, as Nicholas was not willing to create any reforms. How to cite To what extent did Russia undergo economic, Papers

Of mice and men Argumentative Essay Example For Students

Of mice and men Argumentative Essay Of Mice and Men is a book about the socially oppressed and about migrant workers. The workers went through a lot of things in this story. There are many themes in this book, which had to do with them. These themes are violence, nature, loneliness and dreams. Out of these themes I think that loneliness was the most important. However, all the themes played a part in the workers lives. A dream is pictures and ideas a person has in their mind. Dreams are special to people and show how they feel. George and Lennie were the main characters, who had a dream. George and Lennie have been together for a long time and they talked about their dreams. They both just would like to own a farm with animals and a garden. They dont want to have anyone bossing them around anymore. They just want to be their own boss and do what they want to do. They want to be able to run everything their way and no one elses. Violence is a force, which is damaging and negative. There were a few characters that experienced violence in this book. The main one was Curley. He always likes to pick fights with bigger guys and cause trouble. He also likes to threaten people about them getting close to his wife. Another person who caused violence was Lennie. Lennie isnt a violent person he just cant help hurting things. He doesnt mean to cause any of the violence that he puts out. He wouldnt be violent at all if he could just control his strength. Carlson was another person that showed some violence. He kept on pushing Candy about killing his dog. When he ended up killing Candys dog it didnt even bother him he just did it and went on with his life. Nature is living things like the animals and plants. Nature is a beautiful thing that is being ruined by man. In the book the workers cut down trees and build things with it. They dont care about nature at all they just ruin it. The only person that might have liked na ture was Lennie, when he mentioned about living in a cave. Loneliness is when a person feels isolated on the inside, not really important to anyone. Loneliness is a very big theme in this book. Many of the characters experienced this. This is a very sad thing, which I think no one should have at all. One person that had this was Curleys wife, even if it didnt seem so. She was the only woman on a ranch full of men. She didnt have anyone to talk to or share her feelings with. She had a husband, but he didnt want to spend time with her and didnt want her spending time with someone else. Another person is Crooks who kept himself away from everybody. There was too much racism going on, so hed rather keep his space. Candy was also a very lonely person. He has no relatives and his only best friend was his dog who was taken away from him by Carlson. George ended up to be a lonely person in the end. He had Lennie but when he was forced to kill him, he had no one left. The people in this story went through many things. Pretty much every character experienced at least one of these themes. Violence and loneliness seemed to be big parts in the themes in this story. However, loneliness was the strongest theme in the story and no one should experience it. Words/ Pages : 637 / 24 Of mice and men Argumentative Essay Example For Students Of mice and men Argumentative Essay Does Steinbeck reflect a desperate society or does he offer some hope and optimism in his novel Of Mice and MenIn Steinbecks novel Of Mice and Men there are many different characters each expressing there own opinion on whether they are living in a desperate society or that there is indeed some hope and optimism in the world around them. At the time the book was set, which is in the 1930s great American depression, many people were unemployed and jobs were hard to come by. Steinbecks novel centres around the exploits and happenings of a few men, and one women, at the time of this great depression. Steinbeck shows how the most unusual friendships can be created in the mist of this depression and sadness. Such as the strong friendship between Lennie and George. Which in the end, drove George to kill Lennie for his own good. Some characters such as Lennie show how many people at this time had dreams of owning there own piece of land and being able to retire in peace with no one to tell them what to do. This reflects the view of optimism and hope in the book. However some characters such as Crooks see the world around them as desperate and solitary. Crooks believes that no ones dream will come true and that nothing will ever get better, this is shown in the line, Nobody ever gets to heaven, and nobody never gets no land. (page 106) He also says that Lennies dream will always stay as a dream and will never come true. The novel Of Mice and Men on the whole gives many views of hope and optimism and many views of the characters in the book living in a desperate society. I believe that the book balances itself out and that there are equal amounts of each view. The book being as equally optimistic as it is pessimistic. I will discuss how Steinbeck shows these views through his selection of characters and scene settings over the next few paragraphs.At the time the book Of Mice and Men is set many people in America and other countries had a very pessimistic outlook on l ife. The book reflects this view in its character opinions and scene settings. From 1929 to 1939 there were failed businesses, harsh poverty and many people were in long term unemployment. Many people made the migration to California looking for work. Most travelled alone, however, in the case of Lennie and George they travelled together. This is evident when George says, We got somebody to talk to that gives a damn about us. (page 32). Here George is saying how that he and Lennie are different from the rest of the no-hopers in the world around them and that they have a chance to make things better for themselves because they with always have each other. In some cases in the book there is a pessimistic side to Lennie and Georges friendship. The line said by George Hide in the brush till I come for you. (page 34). George repeats this statement about hiding in the brush until he comes many times, to emphasise the point to Lennie. This is suggesting that George does not trust Lennie and that he believes he will do something wrong in the near future. Therefore giving the impression that George believes that the society they are living in is desperate and that Lennie will make the same mistakes over and over again. Another example of how George and Lennies friendship sometimes reflects a desperate society is how George says You crazy son of a bitch. (page 29). This is when George is reflecting on how he could have a much better life without Lennie with him all the time. Also in this section, George shows some compassion for Lennie. After he has finished shouting at Lennie we get the line, He looked ashamedly at Lennies anguished face through the flames and also the line, Poor Bastard. This is showing us how George now feels sorry for Lennie and maybe he realises that he is lucky to have a friend in this desperate society, therefore reflecting some hope and optimism in the book. With George now thinking that he may be able to get to that imaginary piece of land wi th his friend, which for the moment only exists inside the head of Lennie and George. Moving on to section two we see how the Candy like to gossip a lot. Saying things like, Last guy that had this bed was a blacksmith and Used to wash his hands even before he ate (page 39). This is unimportant information and just general gossip. This could show how the society is desperate because it shows how the Candy is lonely and doesnt get to speak to many people. So when there is someone to speak to he seizes the chance to make the most of the conversation. Candy does have one friend though, an old dog. This further emphasises the lonely, desperate environment which the men live in. It shows how Candy has to resort to having an animal as a friend because he knows that an animal will not answer him back and that his dog will always be there, unlike a human at this time which may go off and leave him. Watching My Little Sister Grow Up EssayCurley only sees the world through his eyes and so is supremely selfish. His inability to control or understand his wife brings about Lennie’s death. He is to blame, just as much as his wife and Lennie, but will never accept that. Curley’s Wife How is Curley’s wife described and what does it mean? Quotations Mean? She had full, rouged lips and wide-spaced eyes, heavily made up. Her fingernails were red. Her hair hung in little rolled clusters, like sausages† â€Å"Curley’s wife is described as a â€Å"tart† and is seen as â€Å"jail bait† by the ranch hands† â€Å"Think im gonna stay in that two-by-four house and listen to how Curley’s gonna lead with his left twice, and then bring in the ‘old right cross? Curley’s wife is very lonely, and she is trapped in a loveless marriage. â€Å"You know what I can do to you if you open your trap? † She can be vindictive and she will use the power her status gives her, even if it is totally unfair. â€Å"He says he was gonna put me in the movies† Curley’s wife has her dream destroyed too. Crooks How is Crooks described and what does it mean? Quotations Mean? â€Å"Crooks was a proud, aloof man his eyes seemed to glitter with intensity He had thin, plain tightened lips† Crooks’ life is dominated by pain – the pain of being the only black man and of his â€Å"busted back† – but he has managed to rise above that pain. â€Å"I aint wanted in the bunk house ‘Cause im black† Crooks is a victim of racial prejudice â€Å"I had enough†, he said coldly. â€Å"You got no rights comin’ in a coloured man’s room† Crooks has enough pride and independent to stand up to Curley’s wife. â€Å"Crooks had reduced himself to nothing. There was no personality, no ego – nothing to arouse either like or dislike,† The futility of Crooks’ stand shows how little power a black person has in the world of this novel.